Or more precisely where?
No, the readings don't really touch on that issue. But its an interesting question. Let me put it this way; what enables us to talk about space? I mean, where do we point to and what do we use TO talk about it? Someone might say; Well, I just see it here, its all around me. And I walk through it, and so on. And that might be perfectly fine. And we might accept that. But what does it mean "I see . . ."? In what sense is that automatically meaningful? How do I know by what you say, that we see the same things. And now you might resort to physiology, and psychology, or some other discipline.
But would that be enough? I mean, would that be sufficient for architecture? Would psychology or physiology or anthropology give us the authority to say what it means to see space? To give us a definition? And what about mathematics or philosophy? Each discipline, each author might give us a model, a model of meaning to make clear what space is, what it means to KNOW it.
Can you have, for example, I private language that only you understand? This comes from Wittgenstein. Would it be a language?
Could you say what space is only because you experience it? Would that be the foundation of your knowledge? Then would it be possible to say WE have a concept of space?
Do we "know" the earth is round? That the sun is the center of this solar system? Etc.
Design Office for Research and Architecture
68 Jay Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
USA
646-575-2287
petermacapia@labdora.com
http://labdora.com/
http://atlas.labdora.com/
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Whar is space?
Labels:
Bernard Cache,
boullee,
durand,
geometry,
peter macapia,
topology,
vitruvius,
wittgenstein
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment